I have not been to collage. I have not read a lot of books about philosophy. I didn’t know post humanism was an isum, until recently, even though I had read some of the people who are card carrying members. I don’t know what it means to be a post humanist. I know when I read this it feels like you are very good a putting into words things I think about a feel. Thanks for writing.
Is there then, no questions and concerns, as you see it, to whether one path towards the future or another might deepen or completely sever our connections to the natural world and the health, that we not only generally desire, but is actually completely necessary for our survival? Is that not part of the analysis, to ask: can these relations create and sustain lasting relations, in nature and in health? As, to me, these are actually the only part of the criteria that I find to be most necessary in establishing any true differences in outcomes that will span across any one participants feelings about it all. As in, can we also apply some science to the study of what the effects will be to Nature? Thank you
such inspiring, educated writing...what was your doctoral thesis?
None so far, but thank you. Pursuing my ideas and hoping to get further education at some point
I have not been to collage. I have not read a lot of books about philosophy. I didn’t know post humanism was an isum, until recently, even though I had read some of the people who are card carrying members. I don’t know what it means to be a post humanist. I know when I read this it feels like you are very good a putting into words things I think about a feel. Thanks for writing.
Is there then, no questions and concerns, as you see it, to whether one path towards the future or another might deepen or completely sever our connections to the natural world and the health, that we not only generally desire, but is actually completely necessary for our survival? Is that not part of the analysis, to ask: can these relations create and sustain lasting relations, in nature and in health? As, to me, these are actually the only part of the criteria that I find to be most necessary in establishing any true differences in outcomes that will span across any one participants feelings about it all. As in, can we also apply some science to the study of what the effects will be to Nature? Thank you